Through time, the most effective leaders, such as Dan Izhaky, have developed specific ways of leading, directing, implementing plans, and motivating employees. They can be broadly classified into five different categories:
- Authoritarian Leadership
- Participative Leadership
- Delegative Leadership
Despite these definitions, the questions remain.
- What’s the significance of each of the leadership styles discussed above?
- What is the main difference between different approaches to leadership?
- What are the benefits and drawbacks of each one of the styles of leadership?
Through this article, you’ll learn more about the types of leadership, including their definitions, advantages, and disadvantages. In addition, each of the styles can be distinguished
Authoritarian Leadership
An authoritative leader allows the leader to establish expectations and set results. One-person shows may prove effective in situations where the leader is the best within the group. Although it is a good approach in a time-constrained environment, creativity is reduced since the group’s input is restricted. The authoritarian leadership style is often employed when the team members need clearly defined instructions.
Advantages:
- The time needed to make crucial choices can be cut down.
- The chain of command can be clear about the chain of command.
- The chances of making mistakes in the execution of plans are less likely.
- A style of leadership that is authoritarian produces steady outcomes.
Disadvantages:
- A strict and stern leadership style may result in employee discontent.
- It stifles creativity and ingenuity.
- It decreases synergy between groups and collaboration.
- The group input is drastically reduced.
- The authoritarian approach to leadership can increase turnover.
Participative Leadership
Participative leadership models are built on democratic theories. The goal is to involve participants in the decision-making process. The team members feel involved as they are engaged and motivated to participate. The leader is usually the final word in the process of making decisions. But, if there are differences within a group, finding an agreement could be a lengthy process.
Advantages:
- It boosts the motivation of employees and satisfaction at work.
- It promotes employee imagination.
- A participatory leadership style aids in building strong teams.
- A high level of productivity can be attained.
Disadvantages:
- Processes for making decisions can become lengthy.
- Leaders are more likely to make excuses for their employees.
- Communication problems can occur at times.
- Security concerns can arise due to the lack of transparency in sharing information.
- Unskilled decisions are possible when employees aren’t skilled.
Leadership of delegations
Also referred to in the field of “laissez-faire leadership” the Delegative leadership style is based on delegating responsibility over to the team. This could be a beneficial method if the team members are competent and accountable and are comfortable working as individuals. However, disagreements between team members can cause division and discord within the group, resulting in low motivation and morale.
Advantages:
- Employees with experience can make use of their experience and expertise.
- Innovation and creativity are extremely valued.
- Delegative leadership can create a positive working environment.
Disadvantages:
- Command responsibility isn’t properly defined.
- Delegative leadership can be a challenge when changing with the times.
Dan Izhaky also provides Business Consulting Services that are structured to address a company’s end-to-end business needs.
